From k6 to Simulation: Optimising AWS Burstable Instances

Photo Credit: Nitro Card, Why AWS is best!

In cloud infrastructure, the ultimate challenge is building systems that are not just resilient, but also radically efficient. We cannot afford to provision hardware for peak loads 24/7 because it is simply a waste of money.

In this article, I would like to share how to keep this balance using AWS burstable instances, Grafana observability, and discrete event simulation. Here is the blueprint for moving from seconds to milliseconds without breaking the bank.

The Power (and Risk) of Burstable Instances

To achieve radical efficiency, AWS offers the T-series (like T3 and T4g). These instances allow us to pay for a baseline CPU level while retaining the ability to “burst” during high-traffic periods. This performance is governed by CPU Credits.

Modern T3 instances run on the AWS Nitro System, which offloads I/O tasks. This means nearly 100% of the credits we burn are spent on our actual SQL queries rather than background noise.

By default, Amazon RDS T3 instances are configured for “Unlimited Mode”. This prevents our database from slowing down when credits hit zero, but it comes with a cost: We will be billed for the Surplus Credits.

How CPU Credits are earned vs. spent over time. (Source: AWS re:Invent 2018)

The Experiment: Designing the Stress Test

To truly understand how these credits behave under pressure, we built a controlled performance testing environment.

Our setup involved:

  • The Target: An Amazon RDS db.t3.medium instance.
  • The Generator: An EC2 instance running k6. We chose k6 because it allows us to write performance tests in JavaScript that are both developer-friendly and incredibly powerful.
  • The Workload: We simulated 200 concurrent users hitting an API that triggered heavy, CPU-bound SQL queries.

Simulation Fidelity with Micro-service

If we had k6 connect directly to PostgreSQL, it would not look like real production traffic. In order to make our stress test authentic, we introduce a simple NodeJS micro-service to act as the middleman.

This service does two critical things:

  1. Implements a Connection Pool: Using the pg library Pool with a max: 20 setting, it mimics how a real-world app manages database resources;
  2. Triggers the “Heavy Lifting”: The /heavy-query endpoint is designed to be purely CPU-bound. It forces the database to perform 1,000,000 calculations per request using nested generate_series.
const express = require('express');
const { Pool } = require('pg');
const app = express();
const port = 3000;
const pool = new Pool({
user: 'postgres',
host: '${TargetRDS.Endpoint.Address}',
database: 'postgres',
password: '${DBPassword}',
port: 5432,
max: 20,
ssl: { rejectUnauthorized: false }
});

app.get('/heavy-query', async (req, res) => {
try {
const result = await pool.query('SELECT count(*) FROM generate_series(1, 10000) as t1, generate_series(1, 100) as t2');
res.json({ status: 'success', data: result.rows[0] });
} catch (err) {
res.status(500).json({ error: err.message }); }
});

app.listen(port, () => console.log('API listening'));

In our k6 load test, we do not just flip a switch. We design a specific three-stage lifecycle for our RDS instance:

  1. Ramp Up: We started with a gradual ramp-up from 0 to 50 users. This allows the connection pool to warm up and ensures we are not seeing performance spikes just from initial handshakes;
  2. High-load Burn: We push the target to 200 concurrent users. These users will be hitting a /heavy-query endpoint that forces the database to calculate a million rows per second. This stage is designed to drain the CPUCreditBalance and prove that “efficiency” has its limits;
  3. Ramp Down: Finally, we ramp back down to zero. This is the crucial moment in Grafana where we watch to see if the CPU credits begin to accumulate again or if the instance remains in a “debt” state.
import http from 'k6/http';
import { check, sleep } from 'k6';

export const options = {
stages: [
{ duration: '30s', target: 50 }, // Profile 1: Ramp up
{ duration: '5m', target: 200 }, // Profile 1: Burn
{ duration: '1m', target: 0 }, // Profile 1: Ramp down
],
};

export default function () {
const res = http.get('http://localhost:3000/heavy-query');
check(res, { 'status was 200': (r) => r.status == 200 });
sleep(0.1);
}

Monitoring with Grafana

If we are earning CPU credits slower than we are burning them, we are effectively walking toward a performance (or financial) cliff. To be truly resilient, we must monitor our CPUCreditBalance.

We use Grafana to transform raw CloudWatch signals into a peaceful dashboard. While “Unlimited Mode” keeps the latency flat, Grafana reveals the truth: Our credit balance decreases rapidly when CPU utilisation goes up to 100%.

Grafana showing the inverse relationship between high CPU Utilisation and a dropping CPU Credit Balance.

Predicting the Future with Discrete Event Simulation

Physical load testing with k6 is essential, but it takes real-time to run and costs real money for instance uptime.

To solve this, we modelled Amazon RDS T3 instance using discrete event simulation and the Token Bucket Algorithm. Using the SNA library, a lightweight open-source library for C# and .NET, we can now:

  • Simulate a 24-hour traffic spike in just a few seconds;
  • Mathematically prove whether a rds.t3.medium is more cost-effective for a specific workload;
  • Predict exactly when an instance will run out of credits before we ever deploy it.
Simulation results from the SNA.

Final Thoughts

Efficiency is not just about saving money. Instead, it is about understanding the mathematical limits of our architecture. By combining AWS burstable instances with deep observability and predictive discrete event simulation, we can build systems that are both lean and unbreakable.

For those interested in the math behind the simulation, check out the SNA Library on GitHub.

When Pinecone Wasn’t Enough: My Journey to pgvector

If you work with machine learning or natural language processing, you have probably dealt with storing and searching through vector embeddings.

When I created the Honkai: Star Rail (HSR) relic recommendation system using Gemini, I started with Pinecone. Pinecone is a managed vector database that made it easy to index relic descriptions and character data as embeddings. It helped me find the best recommendations based on how similar they were.

Pinecone worked well, but as the project grew, I wanted more control, something open-source, and a cheaper option. That is when I found pgvector, a tool that adds vector search to PostgreSQL and gives the flexibility of an open-source database.

About HSR and Relic Recommendation System

Honkai: Star Rail (HSR) is a popular RPG that has captured the attention of players worldwide. One of the key features of the game is its relic system, where players equip their characters with relics like hats, gloves, or boots to boost stats and unlock special abilities. Each relic has unique attributes, and selecting the right sets of relics for a character can make a huge difference in gameplay.

An HSR streamer, Unreal Dreamer, learning the new relic feature. (Image Source: Unreal Dreamer YouTube)

As a casual player, I often found myself overwhelmed by the number of options and the subtle synergies between different relic sets. Finding the good relic combination for each character was time-consuming.

This is where LLMs like Gemini come into play. With the ability to process and analyse complex data, Gemini can help players make smarter decisions.

In November 2024, I started a project to develop a Gemini-powered HSR relic recommendation system which can analyse a player’s current characters to suggest the best options for them. In the project, I have been storing embeddings in Pinecone.

Embeddings and Vector Database

An embedding is a way to turn data, like text or images, into a list of numbers called a vector. These vectors make it easier for a computer to compare and understand the relationships between different pieces of data.

For example, in the HSR relic recommendation system, we use embeddings to represent descriptions of relic sets. The numbers in the vector capture the meaning behind the words, so similar relics and characters have embeddings that are closer together in a mathematical sense.

This is where vector databases like Pinecone or pgvector come in. Vector databases are designed for performing fast similarity searches on large collections of embeddings. This is essential for building systems that need to recommend, match, or classify data.

pgvector is an open-source extension for PostgreSQL that allows us to store and search for vectors directly in our database. It adds specialised functionality for handling vector data, like embeddings in our HSR project, making it easier to perform similarity searches without needing a separate system.

Unlike managed services like Pinecone, pgvector is open source. This meant we could use it freely and avoid vendor lock-in. This is a huge advantage for developers.

Finally, since pgvector runs on PostgreSQL, there is no need for additional managed service fees. This makes it a budget-friendly option, especially for projects that need to scale without breaking the bank.

Choosing the Right Model

While the choice of the vector database is important, it is not the key factor in achieving great results. The quality of our embeddings actually is determined by the model we choose.

For my HSR relic recommendation system, when our embeddings were stored in Pinecone, I started by using the multilingual-e5-large model from Microsoft Research offered in Pinecone.

When I migrated to pgvector, I had the freedom to explore other options. For this migration, I chose the all-MiniLM-L6-v2 model hosted on Hugging Face, which is a lightweight sentence-transformer designed for semantic similarity tasks. Switching to this model allowed me to quickly generate embeddings for relic sets and integrate them into pgvector, giving me a solid starting point while leaving room for future experimentation.

The all-MiniLM-L6-v2 model hosted on Hugging Face.

Using all-MiniLM-L6-v2 Model

Once we have decided to use the all-MiniLM-L6-v2 model, the next step is to generate vector embeddings for the relic descriptions. This model is from the sentence-transformers library, so we first need to install the library.

pip install sentence-transformers

The library offers SentenceTransformer class to load pre-trained models.

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer

model_name = 'all-MiniLM-L6-v2'
model = SentenceTransformer(model_name)

At this point, the model is ready to encode text into embeddings.

The SentenceTransformer model takes care of tokenisation and other preprocessing steps internally, so we can directly pass text to it.

# Function to generate embedding for a single text
def generate_embedding(text):
# No need to tokenise separately, it's done internally
# No need to average the token embeddings
embeddings = model.encode(text)

return embeddings

In this function, when we call model.encode(text), the model processes the text through its transformer layers, generating an embedding that captures its semantic meaning. The output is already optimised for tasks like similarity search.

Setting up the Database

After generating embeddings for each relic sets using the all-MiniLM-L6-v2 model, the next step is to store them in the PostgreSQL database with the pgvector extension.

For developers using AWS, there is a good news. In May 2023, AWS announced that Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) for PostgreSQL would be supporting pgvector. In November 2024, Amazon RDS started to support pgvector 0.8.0.

pgvector is now supported on Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL.

To install the extension, we will run the following command in our database. This will introduce a new datatype called VECTOR.

CREATE EXTENSION vector;

After this, we can define our table as follows.

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS embeddings (
id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
vector VECTOR(384),
text TEXT
);

Besides the id column which is for the unique identifier, there are two other columns that are important.

The text column stores the original text for each relic (the two-piece and four-piece bonus descriptions).

The vector column stores the embeddings. The VECTOR(384) type is used to store embeddings, and 384 here refers to the number of dimensions in the vector. In our case, the embeddings generated by the all-MiniLM-L6-v2 model are 384-dimensional, meaning each embedding will have 384 numbers.

Here, a dimension refers to one of the “features” that helps describe something. When we talk about vectors and embeddings, each dimension is just one of the many characteristics used to represent a piece of text. These features could be things like the type of words used, their relationships, and even the overall meaning of the text.

Updating the Database

After the table is created, we can proceed to create INSERT INTO SQL statements to insert the embeddings and their associated text into the database.

In this step, I load the relic information from a JSON file and process it.

import json

# Load your relic set data from a JSON file
with open('/content/hsr-relics.json', 'r') as f:
relic_data = json.load(f)

# Prepare data
relic_info_data = [
{"id": relic['name'], "text": relic['two_piece'] + " " + relic['four_piece']} # Combine descriptions
for relic in relic_data
]

The relic_info_data will then be passed to the following function to generate the INSERT INTO statements.

# Function to generate INSERT INTO statements with vectors
def generate_insert_statements(data):
# Initialise list to store SQL statements
insert_statements = []

for record in data:
# Extracting text and id from the record
id = record.get('id')
text = record.get('text')

# Generate the embedding for the text
embedding = generate_embedding(text)

# Convert the embedding to a list
embedding_list = embedding.tolist()

# Create the SQL INSERT INTO statement
sql_statement = f"""
INSERT INTO embeddings (id, vector, text)
VALUES (
'{id.replace("'", "''")}',
ARRAY{embedding_list},
'{text.replace("'", "''")}')
ON CONFLICT (id) DO UPDATE
SET vector = EXCLUDED.vector, text = EXCLUDED.text;
"""

# Append the statement to the list
insert_statements.append(sql_statement)

return insert_statements
The embeddings of the relic sets are successfully inserted to the database.

How It All Fits Together: Query the Database

Once we have stored the vector embeddings of all the relic sets in our PostgreSQL database, the next step is to find the relic sets that are most similar to a given character’s relic needs.

Just like what we have done for storing relic set embeddings, we need to generate an embedding for the query describing the character’s relic needs. This is done by passing the query through the model as demonstrated in the following code.

def query_similar_embeddings(query_text):
query_embedding = generate_embedding(query_text)

return query_embedding.tolist()

The generated embedding is an array of 384 numbers. We simply use this array in our SQL query below.

SELECT id, text, vector <=> '[<embedding here>]' AS distance
FROM embeddings
ORDER BY distance
LIMIT 3;

The key part of the query is the <=> operator. This operator calculates the “distance” between two vectors based on cosine similarity. In our case, it measures how similar the query embedding is to each stored embedding. The smaller the distance, the more similar the embeddings are.

We use LIMIT 3 to get the top 3 most similar relic sets.

Test Case: Finding Relic Sets for Gallagher

Gallagher is a Fire and Abundance character in HSR. He is a sustain unit that can heal allies by inflicting a debuff on the enemy.

According to the official announcement, Gallagher is a healer. (Image Source: Honkai: Star Rail YouTube)

The following screenshot shows the top 3 relic sets which are closely related to a HSR character called Gallagher using the query “Suggest the best relic sets for this character: Gallagher is a Fire and Abundance character in Honkai: Star Rail. He can heal allies.”

The returned top 3 relic sets are indeed recommended for Gallagher.

One of the returned relic sets is called the “Thief of Shooting Meteor”. It is the official recommended relic set in-game, as shown in the screenshot below.

Gallagher’s official recommended relic set.

Future Work

In our project, we will not be implementing indexing because currently in HSR, there are only a small number of relic sets. Without an index, PostgreSQL will still perform vector similarity searches efficiently because the dataset is small enough that searching through it directly will not take much time. For small-scale apps like ours, querying the vector data directly is both simple and fast.

However, when our dataset grows larger in the future, it is a good idea to explore indexing options, such as the ivfflat index, to speed up similarity searches.

References

[KOSD] Solving SQL File Encoding Issues on Git with PowerShell

Few days ago, some of our teammates discovered that the SQL files they tried to pull from our GitHub repo had encoding issue. When they did git pull, there would be an error saying “fatal: failed to encode ‘…/xxxxx.sql’ from UTF-16-LE-BOM to UTF-8”.

In addition, on GitHub, the SQL files we committed to the GitHub are all marked as binary files. Thus we couldn’t view the changes we made to those files in the commit.

Cause of the Issue

It turns out that those SQL files are generated from SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS).

Default file encoding of SSMS is Western European (Windows) – Codepage 1252.

By default, the encoding used to save SQL files in SSMS is UTF-16. For my case, my default encoding is the “Western European (Windows) – Codepage 1252”. Codepage 1252 is a single-byte character encoding of the Latin alphabet that was used in Windows for English and many Romance and Germanic languages. This encoding will cause Git to treat the files as binary files.

Solution

The way to resolve this issue is to force the file to use UTF-8 encoding. We can run the following PowerShell script to change the encoding of all SQL files in a given directory and its subdirectories.

$Utf8NoBomEncoding = New-Object System.Text.UTF8Encoding $False

Get-ChildItem "<absolute directory path>" -Recurse *.sql | foreach {
    $FilePath = $_.FullName
    $FileContent = Get-Content $FilePath
    [System.IO.File]::WriteAllLines($FilePath, $FileContent, $Utf8NoBomEncoding)
}

The BOM (Byte Order Mark), a sequence of bytes at the start of a text stream (0xEF, 0xBB, 0xBF), is used to signal the endianness of an encoding, but since endianness is irrelevant to UTF-8, the BOM is unnecessary. This explains why we pass $False to the constructor of UTF8Encoding to indicate that BOM is not needed.

Wrap-Up

That’s all for a short little PowerShell script we used to solve the encoding issue of our SQL files.

There is an interesting discussion on StackOverflow about this issue, please give it a read too.

KOSD, or Kopi-O Siew Dai, is a type of Singapore coffee that I enjoy. It is basically a cup of coffee with a little bit of sugar. This series is meant to blog about technical knowledge that I gained while having a small cup of Kopi-O Siew Dai.

[KOSD] Let’s Talk about CASE

Last week, a developer in our team encountered an interesting question in his SQL script on SQL Server 2019. For the convenience of discussion, I’ve simplified his script as follow.

DECLARE @NUM AS TINYINT = 0
DECLARE @VAL AS VARCHAR(MAX) = '20.50'

SELECT CASE @NUM WHEN 0 THEN CAST(@VAL AS DECIMAL(10, 2))
                 WHEN 1 THEN CAST(@VAL AS DECIMAL(10, 4))
                 ELSE -1 
       END AS Result

The result he expected was 20.50 because @NUM equals to 0, so by right the first result expression should be executed. However, the truth is that it returned 20.5000 as if the second result expression which is casting @VAL into a decimal value with a scale of 4 was run.

So, what is the cause of this issue here?

SQL Data Types Implicit Conversion

First of all, according to the Microsoft Learn documentation, the data types of all result expressions must be the same or must be an implicit conversion.

In the script above, we have two data types in the result expressions, i.e. DECIMAL and INT (-1 in the ELSE result expression). Hence, we need to understand the implicit data type conversions that are allowed for SQL Server system-supplied data types, as shown below. The table below shows that INT can be implicit converted to DECIMAL and vice versa.

All data type conversions allowed for SQL Server system-supplied data types (Image Source: Microsoft Learn)

Data Precendence

While the above chart illustrates all the possible explicit and implicit conversions, we still do not know the resulting data type of the conversion. For our case above, the resulting data type depends on the rules of data type precedence.

According to the data type precedence in SQL Server, we have the following precedence order for data types.

  1. user-defined data types (highest)
  2. sql_variant
  3. xml
  4. datetimeoffset
  5. datetime2
  6. datetime
  7. smalldatetime
  8. date
  9. time
  10. float
  11. real
  12. decimal
  13. money
  14. smallmoney
  15. bigint
  16. int
  17. smallint
  18. tinyint
  19. bit
  20. ntext
  21. text
  22. image
  23. timestamp
  24. uniqueidentifier
  25. nvarchar (including nvarchar(max) )
  26. nchar
  27. varchar (including varchar(max) )
  28. char
  29. varbinary (including varbinary(max) )
  30. binary (lowest)

Since DECIMAL has a higher precedence than INT, hence we are sure that the script above will result in a DECIMAL output with the highest scale, i.e. DECIMAL(10, 4). This explains why the result of his script is 20.5000.

Conclusion

Now, if we change the script above to be something as follows, we should receive an error saying “Error converting data type varchar to numeric”.

DECLARE @NUM AS TINYINT = 0
DECLARE @VAL AS VARCHAR(MAX) = '20.50'

SELECT CASE @NUM WHEN 0 THEN 'A'
                 WHEN 1 THEN CAST(@VAL AS DECIMAL(10, 4))
                 ELSE -1 
       END AS Result

Yup, that’s all about our discussion about the little bug he found in his script. Hope you find it useful. =)

References

KOSD, or Kopi-O Siew Dai, is a type of Singapore coffee that I enjoy. It is basically a cup of coffee with a little bit of sugar. This series is meant to blog about technical knowledge that I gained while having a small cup of Kopi-O Siew Dai.